How Do Child Custody Laws Help Kids
Child custody battles, and the ensuing oversight of law enforcement in the child’s upbringing, can feel like unwarranted intrusion into family matters. However, child custody laws are designed with the child’s well being in mind and, where warranted, most children will benefit from state intervention. The primary aim of any child custody judgement is to secure the safety and wellbeing of the child, for this reason alone child custody laws protect and safeguard kids.
Child custody judgements come in a variety of forms which generally depend upon the makeup of the family and the circumstances of the judgement. Lets take a look at the two most common court judgements and ask: How do child custody laws help kids?
- Joint custody. In the event that both parents or guardians of a child or children demonstrate a willingness and practical ability to care for the children jointly a judge will favour a joint custody ruling. This decision essentially awards both parents / guardians joint legal and physical custody of the children, and is therefore subject to the partners agreeing some kind of schedule to share time with the kids.
- Sole custody. In the event that joint custody is objectionable due to geography, accommodation or, in extreme cases, forms of abuse or lawlessness by one or both guardian’s; sole custody will be awarded to one parent, or grandparent. This entails the guardian taking full legal and physical responsibility for the child. To off-set this, a judge may award visitation rights to the absent parent or, if the separation is amicable, will advise the couple to establish their own visitation schedule.
The use of these two key judgements, when combined with the visitation rights consideration, provides a simple but powerful set of rules to govern a parent’s access to their children. It should be remembered that a judges prime directive is to take whatever action is most beneficial (or least damaging) to the child and so will always favour a joint custody decision if it is practical and safe.
Child custody laws are, by their nature, enforceable by the court. This adds another level of protection to the child in that once a court decision has been made, a parent can petition law enforcement to take action if the terms of the ruling are being ignored.
This can take many forms, such as: A parent who has lost legal custody of their child demanding time beyond their visitation agreement. A legal guardian not fulfilling their duties to protect and care for the child. A partner not fulfilling their half of care for the child if a joint custody agreement has been reached, and so on.
In any situation where child custody is considered by a judge, the primary factor that all other concerns are weighed against is the overall welfare of the child in any given scenario. It should be clear then, that whatever custody arrangement is chosen, the choice is likely to be the most beneficial one for the child.
Tagged with: Custody Laws • Favour • Sole Custody • Unwarranted Intrusion • Upbringing
Filed under: Attorney Articles
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!

Gulp!
“Don’t eat so fast!” and “chew your food!” are words most people have heard at some point during their upbringing, but most animals don’t have the luxury of paying attention to the finer points of good table manners and digestion.
more…
Are you or someone you know trying to successfully step parent? Step back and picture the child involved. It is also tough trying to decide where loyalty lies. They have also been through a divorce and battled child custody laws the same as you… Recent Article published on 2/6/2010 by carynlee
Just another example of people in power hiding the truth.
I've been there done that: bought the T-Shirt, Coffee Mug and bumper sticker
(. Sorry I can't help more b/c I'm in the EXACT same place. I'm sorry; I know that's not much consolation.
Steve Christie cannot see his son because his Japanese ex-wife has sole custody, a typical arrangement in Japan. He is one of about 70 American parents in that position, and the U.S. warned Tokyo this week that it must revise its family laws or risk hurting ties between the two longtime allies.
What is the point of publishing this retarded exchange?
Even the link is busted.
hope others didn’t rave off for you. great track btw
True Story RT I'm more interested in a woman's culture and upbringing. There are many different shades of ho.
Cameron Douglas Denied Bail: Lawyers Say ‘Dysfunctional Upbringing’ Caused His …
Huffington Post (blog)
According to the NY Daily News, lawyers of Michael Douglas’ son, Cameron, say that their client’s drug problems stem from his upbringing by his famous …
and more »
I am one of many hundreds of thousands fathers violated and abused in Canadian Family Court. Without any evidence of wrongdoing on my part, in the presence of substantiated evidence of my ex-wifes violent, irrational and destructive behavior my parental and property rights were violated by the court. My children and my property were wrenched away from me and I have been forced to pay to get back what is rightfully mine. The court system must go, it’s corrupted beyond repair.
You amy get your reply here
Working fast; winds are starting to pick up on our wee snow event (last night’s forecasters said it was gonna be “a Cat 2 Hurricane type of blizzard”) and my Internet connection has been spotty already!
Anyways… Here’s the latest from Alaska: the official filing for sole custody of Tripp in “Palin V Johnston” Sarah Palin’s daughter Bristol has sued Levi Johnston for sole custody of their child, Tripp Johnston-Palin, and now two superior court judges have unsealed the court record and denied Palin’s request that pseudonyms be used, the Alaska Dispatch reports. Palin filed for custody on November 4, at which time Judge Kari C. Kristiansen issued a temporary order limiting access to the case files and allowed the parties to file under pseudonyms. Johnston, however, appealed those decisions. On December 23, Kristiansen denied Palin’s request for a closed proceeding. On the same day, Presiding Judge Sharon Gleason denied Palin’s request to use pseudonyms. For his part, Johnston said…
“Internet firms have condemned the government’s “Big Brother” surveillance plans as an “unwarranted” intrusion into people’s privacy.
The companies, which ministers are relying on to implement the scheme, also say the government has misled the public about how far it plans to go in monitoring internet use.
The criticism, contained in a private submission to the Home Office, threatens to derail the £2 billion project, which ministers claim is essential to combat terrorism and crime.”
Vaccine refusers have long decried vaccine mandates and campaigns as an unwarranted intrusion of parents’ and local school boards’ rights. And against the backdrop of…
read more
I don't think it's right, especially if the family has no say in the matter. It would be different if they were given the option. The least the mortuary could do is foot the bill for the entire obituary to appear in the paper, logo and all, since funerals are so expensive to begin with.
I had no idea this kind of thing is actually happening. Thanks for posting & increasing awareness.
i hate demi lovoto
jazakallah khair, i loved your lectures on “Who wrote the bible”.